Go back to all articles

Top 8 Gatling Alternatives Overview

Dec 16, 2024
7 min read

Gatling Cloud, a cloud-based extension of the open-source performance testing tool, is a powerful load testing solution with its benefits. Those include excellent scalability, no-code test builder, moderate price for virtual user hours (VUh), and numerous useful integrations. However, with its steep learning curve due to reliance on Scala/Java and setup (and overall) complexity, it may not be a perfect fit for time-critical projects.

In this material, we compiled some effective solutions that can work as alternatives to Gatling. Let us take a closer look and highlight the main features.

1. PFLB

Gatling competitors

PFLB comes to mind first as it supports JMeter, the best open-source Gatling alternative. It is an AI-powered, cloud-based performance testing tool designed for both experienced and novice users, including developers, performance engineers, marketers, and project managers. It is scalable, flexible, and intuitive and enables distributed load testing without requiring complex infrastructure.

Key Features

  • Cloud Scalability: Supports over 3,000,000 requests per second for large-scale, global applications.
  • AI-Powered Insights: Automates performance bottleneck detection with real-time analytics and optimization suggestions.
  • No-Code Script Builder: Intuitive drag-and-drop interface for creating and customizing HTTP(S) requests.
  • Traffic Cloning: Imports Google Analytics data to replicate realistic user behavior.
  • Integrations: Seamlessly connects with Grafana, Postman, Insomnia, and CI/CD tools while supporting JMeter test imports.

Unique Advantages

  • Advanced AI features for performance monitoring and reporting that save time for your experts.
  • A dedicated team of experts is ready to assist you with performance testing services.
  • User-friendly design is accessible to non-technical users.
  • Effective and accurate testing due to realistic load generation.

Comparison with Gatling

Among other Gatling alternatives PFLB features a quicker setup due to a user-friendly no-code interface. The VUh priсe is slightly higher, but the AI-powered features save hours of work for the team, while traffic cloning provides accurate insights.

Key Takeaways

PFLB is ideal for teams seeking fast, scalable, and user-friendly performance testing, especially for web applications and APIs. Its AI-driven features and cloud-first architecture enhance efficiency.

Start FREE Load Testing with PFLB

Need help with load testing? Hire an expert

2. LoadNinja

gatling competitors

LoadNinja is a cloud-based platform for browser-based performance testing of websites and web applications. Instead of load emulators, it uses real browsers, offering accurate, actionable metrics to measure application performance. With AI-driven features, it makes load testing simpler by handling dynamic values like session IDs and tokens automatically.

Key Features

  • Real-Browser Testing: Employs actual browsers for accurate metrics.
  • AI Automation: Manages dynamic data (e.g., session IDs) to minimize manual input.
  • Record and Playback: Simple test creation by recording user actions.
  • Anomaly Detection: Identifies issues with visuals and data (e.g., sudden downtimes).
  • Analytics and Reporting: Provides browser-based metrics with detailed reports.

Unique Advantages

  • Expected minimal learning curve thanks to record-and-playback features.
  • Subscription-based and on-demand pricing for flexible usage.
  • Built-in AI for faster, smarter anomaly detection.

Comparison with Gatling

LoadNinja automates dynamic value management, unlike Gatling, which requires manual scripting. However, Gatling supports private clouds and production traffic analysis, areas where LoadNinja has limitations.

Key Takeaways

LoadNinja has a slightly alternative technology: it uses browser based testing instead of protocol-based — like Gatling. Its reliance on AJAX and lack of private cloud support or production traffic analysis may not meet every need.

3. Apache JMeter

Gatling alternatives

The benchmark of the industry and an open-source performance testing tool designed for comprehensive web application performance testing. In contrast to other Gatling alternatives, Apache JMeter is for those, who do not need cloud capabilities. It is the most popular testing tool, and the community around it is very large, so one can rely on it while solving complex issues.

It supports a wide range of protocols, making it highly versatile for evaluating server-side performance. Written in Java, JMeter is free and accessible for businesses of all sizes.

Key Features

  • Protocol Support: HTTP/HTTPS, REST APIs, SOAP, FTP, JDBC, LDAP, SMTP, IMAP, POP3, and more.
  • Extensibility: Supports community plugins for custom scenarios.
  • Distributed Testing: Allows testing across multiple machines or Kubernetes clusters.
  • Performance Metrics: Integrates with tools like Grafana, InfluxDB, and Prometheus for real-time analysis.
  • Reporting: Provides basic reporting for response times, error rates, and throughput.
  • Community Support: Extensive documentation and active community resources.

Unique Advantages

  • Free and open source.
  • Wide protocol compatibility for diverse testing scenarios.
  • Command-line interface and plugin support for advanced use cases.
  • Strong integration options with CI/CD tools and monitoring platforms.

Comparison with Gatling

JMeter offers broader protocol support, making it ideal for enterprise-level testing. However, its legacy GUI and complexity in handling dynamic applications make it less user-friendly compared to Gatling’s modern interface.

Key Takeaways

JMeter is a versatile, free solution for protocol-level testing, suited for both large-scale and functional testing. Its open-source nature and broad integrations make it adaptable, but its legacy design and infrastructure setup requirements may pose challenges for users seeking modern, cloud-based alternatives.

4. Locust

Gatling alternative tools

Locust is an open-source, Python-based load testing tool that simplifies creating and executing performance tests. This one of the Gatling alternatives allows testers to define user behavior with Python code, making it intuitive for engineers familiar with programming. Locust’s cloud-based solution, Locust.cloud, offers hosted load generators and a web UI for managing tests.

Key Features

  • Protocol Support: HTTP/HTTPS, REST API, WebSocket, gRPC, Kafka.
  • Cloud Capabilities: Hosted load generators and real-time web dashboards via Locust.cloud.
  • Distributed Testing: Supports scalable, distributed load testing.
  • Python Scripting: Write concise and flexible user scenarios using Python.
  • OpenTelemetry Support: Exports trace data for detailed performance insights.

Unique Advantages

  • Detailed and beginner-friendly documentation with examples.
  • Python’s flexibility allows importing libraries and creating custom workflows.
  • Web UI provides real-time visualization and dashboards.
  • Simplified scripting lowers the entry barrier for junior testers while appealing to senior engineers with its robust capabilities.

Comparison with Gatling

Locust offers a simpler scripting experience using Python, while Gatling uses Scala, which may be less familiar to some testers. Locust’s real-time web UI is more user-friendly for test monitoring, whereas Gatling focuses on developer-centric integrations. Gatling has stronger built-in reporting and script recording capabilities, which Locust lacks.

Key Takeaways

Locust is an accessible, scalable tool suitable for testers at any experience level, thanks to its Python-based scripting and distributed testing features. While Locust.cloud enhances functionality with hosted generators and dashboards, the lack of a free tier, private cloud support, and built-in script recording may limit its appeal for some users. Take a closer look at Load Testing using Locust.

5. LoadRunner (for those who don’t care about pricing)

gatling competitors

LoadRunner is a robust performance testing tool ideal for complex enterprise applications, legacy systems, and ERP software. It enables the emulation of thousands of users to simulate real-world application loads and ensure readiness for live environments. Among all the other Gatling competitors, this one is the most expensive. 

Key Features

  • Extensive Protocol Support: Compatible with various technologies like .NET, Java, SOAP, Flex, AJAX, Citrix, and ERP systems.
  • Advanced Scripting Options: Record & Playback feature automates test creation, while debugging tools allow step-by-step execution and detailed logging.
  • Performance Metrics Analysis: Collects and analyzes data from key infrastructure components like web and database servers.
  • Intuitive User Interface: Streamlined design improves usability for testers of all experience levels.
  • Robust Integrations: Integrates with tools like ALM, SiteScope, Selenium, and Jenkins to enhance performance testing.

Unique Advantages

  • Predictive analytics for forecasting performance bottlenecks.
  • Advanced mobile testing capabilities for network and device performance.
  • Real User Monitoring (RUM) for capturing real-time user interactions.
  • Comprehensive analysis tools to pinpoint root causes of issues.

Comparison with Gatling

LoadRunner offers extensive protocol support and advanced integrations, making it ideal for enterprise-scale applications. In contrast, Gatling is lightweight and script-based, better suited for agile teams needing quick test setups. LoadRunner’s predictive analytics and diagnostic tools surpass Gatling’s capabilities but come at a higher cost and complexity.

Key Takeaways

LoadRunner is a premium performance testing tool designed for large-scale, complex applications. Its rich protocol support, advanced debugging, and integration capabilities make it an enterprise favorite: Take a look at SAP load testing using LoadRunner. However, the high cost and licensing constraints make it not the perfect choice for SMEs.

6. Artillery

gatling competitors

Artillery is an open-source tool for simulating virtual user traffic and browser-based load testing with Playwright scripts. Tests are defined using simple YAML files and executed via the command line. Artillery Cloud provides dashboards and analytics for easier performance data interpretation.

Key Features

  • Browser-Based Testing: Supports Playwright for stress testing.
  • Protocol Support: HTTP/HTTPS, REST API, GraphQL, WebSocket, gRPC, Kafka.
  • Artillery Cloud: Free cloud-based analytics and dashboards.
  • Private Cloud Support: Enables secure performance testing.

Unique Advantages

  • Free cloud-based analytics.
  • Secure private cloud testing.
  • Multi-protocol support for diverse scenarios.

Comparison with Gatling

Artillery is simpler to configure with YAML files and excels in browser-based testing. It supports private clouds, unlike Gatling, but lacks hosted load generators and bottleneck analysis tools. Gatling offers better integration with APM tools.

Key Takeaways

Artillery is a flexible, user-friendly tool for browser and protocol testing, with strong cloud features. However, it relies on CLI and lacks and cannot identify bottlenecks.

7. Neoload

best Gatling alternatives

NeoLoad is a performance testing and monitoring tool designed for enterprise-level applications. It supports load and stress testing for APIs, web, and mobile applications. Known for its ease of use and robust integrations, NeoLoad simplifies creating and executing tests through graphical workflows and automated processes.

Key Features

  • Browser-based testing: does not require expert technical skills to test dynamic, custom web, and cloud-native applications
  • Dynamic Infrastructure: Supports containerized environments and auto-scaling for large-scale tests.
  • Graphical Test Design: Allows visual creation of complex test scenarios without extensive scripting.
  • Real-Time Analytics: Offers detailed metrics and dashboards for instant insights.
  • CI/CD Integrations: Seamlessly integrates with Jenkins, Azure DevOps, and other CI/CD tools.

Unique Advantages

  • No-code test creation for faster workflows.
  • Built-in support for legacy systems and modern cloud-native architectures.
  • Automatic correlation for session management and dynamic values.
  • Scalable infrastructure for large, distributed performance testing.

Comparison with Gatling

NeoLoad is more accessible to non-developers with its graphical interface and automation capabilities, whereas Gatling requires scripting in Scala. NeoLoad excels in enterprise environments with strong legacy system support and advanced analytics. Gatling, in contrast, is better suited for lightweight, developer-centric testing.

Key Takeaways

NeoLoad is a comprehensive performance testing tool ideal for large-scale and complex applications. Its ease of use, strong DevOps integrations, and scalability make it a go-to choice for enterprises. However, its licensing costs and advanced features may be excessive for small teams or simple projects.

8. Grafana Cloud K6

Gatling performance testing alternatives

K6 is an open-source tool for developers using JavaScript. It supports load testing of websites, APIs, GraphQL, WebSocket, and more. With Grafana Cloud K6, a commercial extension, it offers cloud-based load generators and allows distributed testing across 21 locations.

Key Features

  • Protocol Support: HTTP/HTTPS, REST API, WebSocket, gRPC, GraphQL, Kafka (via xk6), and browser-based testing (via xk6-browser).
  • Scalable Load Testing: Supports distributed tests and high user concurrency.
  • Performance Insights: Tracks trends over time and correlates results with server-side metrics.
  • Ease of Use: GUI test builder and browser recorder for creating test scripts.
  • Integration with Grafana: Seamless visualization and analysis of performance data.

Unique Advantages

  • Lightweight with minimal resource consumption.
  • High scalability for stress and reliability testing.
  • Advanced observability features with automated correlation of test results and metrics.
  • Supports private cloud testing and global load generation from 21 zones.

Comparison with Gatling

K6 is designed for developers who use JavaScript for scripting and integrating well with Grafana. It offers better monitoring tools and cloud scalability than Gatling. However, Gatling is easier for non-developers to use, with a simpler interface and support for Scala scripting, while K6 requires more technical skills.

Key Takeaways

K6 is a robust and scalable performance testing solution, ideal for engineering teams seeking automation, detailed insights, and Grafana integration. While its developer focus and minimal resource use are strengths, its complexity and reliance on JavaScript may pose challenges for non-developer audiences.

Conclusion

The market for performance testing tools offers varied alternatives to Gatling. The closest one is JMeter, but it does not have native cloud capabilities. In this case, PFLB stands out as a strong second, offering cloud-native architecture, AI-driven insights, and user-friendly features. The ultimate decision, however, hinges on your team’s technical proficiency, the complexity of your project, and the demands of your infrastructure.

Need Help with Load Testing?

Table of contents

    Related insights in blog articles

    Explore what we’ve learned from these experiences
    4 min read

    DevOps Pro Europe Conference 2025 – Advance Your DevOps Expertise

    devops pro europe preview
    Feb 21, 2025

    DevDays Europe is the ultimate software development conference that aims to bring together the brightest minds and innovators in the software development community. Join the conference for an immersive experience filled with transformative insights, collaborative opportunities, and the latest cutting-edge technology. The DevDays Europe 2024 will be happening both on-site and online, allowing everyone to join the event in their preferred format.

    13 min read

    How to Speed Up a WordPress Site

    how to speed up a website — part 1 preview
    Feb 17, 2025

    We have a lot of experience in the field of web performance optimization, so we would like to share with you our best practices for solving such problems. In this part of the article, we will cover how to test a website on the WordPress platform, give you useful tools and important metrics for website testing. Additionally, we will shed light on site performance optimization.

    7 min read

    Top 6 K6 Alternatives Overview

    k6 alternatives
    Feb 13, 2025

    K6 is a lightweight tool designed for developers using JavaScript. It’s easy to write simple test scenarios, especially for microservices or static websites. K6’s low resource usage and free version with limited features make it attractive for quick, small-scale testing. However, for more complex scenarios, such as distributed testing or advanced data pool management, K6 […]

    9 min read

    Product Drops: Everything You Need To Know

    product drops everything you need to know preview
    Feb 7, 2025

    Product drops have become a powerful strategy for brands to generate excitement, drive sales, and build loyal customer bases. According to PYMNTS’ research, nearly 72% of Generation Z and bridge millennials reported feeling a stronger connection to brands that engaged in product drops. But executing a successful drop demands precision in planning, marketing, and digital […]

  • Be the first one to know

    We’ll send you a monthly e-mail with all the useful insights that we will have found and analyzed