Go back to all articles

Performance Testing with Postman: Is It Worth It?

Jan 6, 2023
5 min read

Postman is a quite popular tool for checking APIs’ work and running functional and integration tests easily. However, many developers also try to use Postman for API performance testing. Some of them simply measure the response time with available functions, while others go as far as writing scripts from scratch to try and trick the system into simulating the load. In this blog post, we will share our opinion of the foundations of these methods and discuss if they are worth your time.

What Is Postman?

Postman is one of the most famous tools for working with different API types, such as REST, gRPC, GraphQL, and even SOAP. Millions of developers design, create, and test application programming interfaces with Postman. One of the tool’s greatest advantages is that you can send requests to APIs and endpoints and retrieve data from the source without going to the console or writing a single line of code.

  • 01
    Enter your request details
  • 02
    The API server
  • 03
    Postman receives the response and displays it in the interface

This feature helped Postman get the reputation of a user-friendly tool to debug and test APIs “in one click”. Indeed, it is very convenient and useful and does well with functional and integration tests. However, in addition to these, many try to run load, performance, and stress tests with Postman, although the software is not designed for such tasks. Let’s try to understand how enthusiasts manage to do load testing with Postman, and what results they get.

What Type of Performance Testing Do You Need?
Find out on a free consultation with our experts.

Ways to Use Postman for Load Testing

We have found three basic scenarios of using Postman to test performance.

  • 01
    Running embedded tests, for example, measuring the response time.
  • 02
    Trying to create the load with Collection Runner and Newman.
  • 03
    Writing special scripts for parallel execution of requests.

The choice usually depends on the level of developers’ expertise and the time they are ready to spare for the task. It’s just about time to find out if API load testing in Postman does work.

Way 1: Measure response time in Postman.

The most popular operation in Postman is testing individual API queries, which is quite logical since the tool was designed primarily for functional testing. When they speak of performance testing in Postman, they usually mean one particular test – response time measurement. It is rather easy to run:

  • 01
    Add a new collection in the sidebar.
  • 02
    Add a new GET request with variables.
  • 03
    Go to the Tests tab.
  • 04
    Choose Response time is less than 200ms from the list of snippets.
  • 05
    Under Collections, select Run.
Test with postman image02 resize

Yes, it is that easy! The problem is… such tests have nothing to do with performance testing. In fact, all requests in Postman are sent one by one, whilst the basic idea of load tests is to check how the system copes with simultaneous requests from a large number of users.

How to use postman

Way 2: Create multiple requests in Postman Collection Runner

You might want to argue that Collection Runner in Postman was designed specifically to create multiple requests! Indeed, developers have added this tool so that users could send multiple requests to the API. It still has nothing to do with performance testing, though.
Collection Runner is designed to automate tests. It allows you to specify a sequence of API requests, transfer data between them, use various environments, and perform other tasks. Seems like a great solution, but the keyword here is still “sequence”, and each operation will be run one after another.

Test with postman image06

And even if you add thousands of iterations to your requests, they will all be run in a sequence. In other words, your API will only handle one request per a time period and will not experience any load.

Test with postman image05 resize

There are more “exotic” ways to abuse Collection Runner and make it carry out requests simultaneously, but their efficiency is highly questionable.

Way 3: Force Postman to launch several collections simultaneously using Newman

Some enthusiasts go even further and try to create scripts that allow them to run multiple collections simultaneously. To run one of them you need to leave the handy interface and use Postman’s CLI Newman — a tool to manage the Collection Runner via the console. It is designed to integrate functional API testing into the CI/CD pipeline, but maybe we should give it a try.

The scripts themselves are easy to find on GitHub. As the description says, they are intended to run multiple collections in parallel, which should mimic simultaneous requests from users. This seems closer to performance testing, as the API receives many requests simultaneously and will experience some load.

The problem is, in this case you will have zero control over the process. For example, processing a high number of requests could lead to a CPU or RAM overloading and test failure, while you will not receive any information about the runs at all. Even if you get lucky and everything goes well, the results of such a test would not show you a real picture of API performance, because it is not scenario-based. In other words, real people usually don’t send thousands of requests in a moment, and Postman does not allow you, for instance, to gradually increase the load.

Which method really works?

Unfortunately, none of the above. Postman works perfectly for functional and integration testing, but creating the load for APIs is simply something out of its scope. If you need to test your API performance, it’s highly recommended to use a specialized API load testing tool specifically designed for the task, such as PFLB.

It has a user-friendly interface and does not require any coding skills either. But most importantly, it will provide you with an objective result, help you make conclusions about your API performance, and fix the problems that need fixing.

For a deeper understanding of the topic, including strategies beyond load testing, check out our best tips to improve API performance and ensure your system is optimized from end to end.

Table of contents

    Related insights in blog articles

    Explore what we’ve learned from these experiences
    8 min read

    gRPC vs. REST: Detailed Comparison

    grpc vs rest preview
    Jun 24, 2025

    Choosing between gRPC and REST can feel confusing, especially if you’re trying to figure out the best way for your applications to communicate. This article breaks down the grpc vs rest comparison clearly, without jargon or confusion. You’ll learn exactly what each protocol is, the advantages and disadvantages of each, and understand why gRPC is […]

    5 min read

    Top 10 Data Masking K2view Alternatives

    k2view alternatives preview
    Jun 20, 2025

    If you’re exploring alternatives to K2view for data masking, this guide breaks down the top tools worth considering. We’ve compiled the leading solutions that serve a variety of industries — from finance and healthcare to DevOps-heavy SaaS. You’ll find a detailed comparison table of K2View competitors, full tool breakdowns, and a closer look at PFLB […]

    3 min read

    How to Generate AI-Powered Load Test Reports with PFLB

    pflb ai powered load test report preview
    Jun 18, 2025

    Say goodbye to tedious manual reporting after load testing! With PFLB’s innovative AI-powered report generation, performance engineers can quickly turn detailed test data into comprehensive reports. This guide walks you step-by-step through setting up your test, running it, and effortlessly generating exhaustive performance analysis — so you spend less time reporting and more time optimizing. […]

    6 min read

    K2view vs Oracle Data Masking: Which Tool Is Better?

    k2 vs oracle data masking tool preview
    Jun 16, 2025

    Not all data masking tools are built for the same kind of job. Some are better suited for locked-in enterprise stacks; others focus on flexibility across fragmented systems. In this article, you’ll find K2View vs Oracle Data Masking comparison through the lens of performance, ease of use, integration range, scalability, and compliance coverage. If you’re […]

  • Be the first one to know

    We’ll send you a monthly e-mail with all the useful insights that we will have found and analyzed