Go back to all articles

Loadrunner vs. Neoload: Which Tool Is Better?

May 5, 2025
5 min read
author sona

Sona Hakobyan

Author

Sona Hakobyan

Sona Hakobyan is a Senior Copywriter at PFLB. She writes and edits content for websites, blogs, and internal platforms. Sona participates in cross-functional content planning and production. Her experience includes work on international content teams and B2B communications.

Senior Copywriter

Reviewed by Boris Seleznev

boris author

Reviewed by

Boris Seleznev

Boris Seleznev is a seasoned performance engineer with over 10 years of experience in the field. Throughout his career, he has successfully delivered more than 200 load testing projects, both as an engineer and in managerial roles. Currently, Boris serves as the Professional Services Director at PFLB, where he leads a team of 150 skilled performance engineers.

When evaluating performance testing tools, many teams find themselves comparing LoadRunner vs NeoLoad; two powerful solutions trusted by enterprises worldwide. In this article, we’ll walk you through their core features, strengths, and limitations to help you make an informed choice. 

But that’s not all! We’ll also introduce you to PFLB, a modern performance testing platform that combines the best of both tools while solving many of their drawbacks. Whether you’re testing APIs, enterprise applications, or cloud-native systems, this guide will help you choose the right tool for your development and business environment.

What Is LoadRunner?

LoadRunner-logo

LoadRunner (developed by Micro Focus, now part of OpenText) is one of the most established performance testing tools in the industry. Built to simulate virtual users and measure system behavior under heavy load, LoadRunner supports complex enterprise environments and remains a go-to solution for large-scale testing projects.

Its modular architecture separates test creation, execution, and analysis, allowing distributed and highly customizable test runs, from legacy applications to modern web services.

Key Features

  • Broad protocol coverage: LoadRunner supports more than 50 protocols out of the box, including HTTP/S, Web Services (SOAP/REST), Citrix, SAP GUI, Oracle, and custom TCP/IP, making it highly versatile for different business applications.
  • GUI and script-based testing with VuGen: Virtual User Generator (VuGen) allows testers to record and create user behavior scripts using intuitive graphical workflows or detailed scripting in C, JavaScript, or other languages.
  • Continuous integration/continuous delivery (CI/CD) integration: LoadRunner integrates with tools like Jenkins, Azure DevOps, and Bamboo, supporting performance testing automation within development pipelines.
  • Controller and load generator architecture: LoadRunner’s architecture uses a Controller to design and orchestrate tests while Load Generators simulate multiple virtual users across distributed environments, ensuring realistic load conditions.

Quick Summary Table of LoadRunner

AspectDetails
Protocol CoverageHTTP/S, SAP, Citrix, Oracle, TCP/IP, and more
Test DesignGUI and advanced script-based (C, JavaScript)
ScalabilityEnterprise-level (hundreds of thousands of users)
CI/CD IntegrationJenkins, Azure DevOps, Bamboo
Best ForLegacy apps, SAP, Citrix, large enterprises
PricingComplex, based on VU licenses and protocols
Main ChallengesSteep learning curve, resource-heavy, high licensing cost

Advantages

  • Enterprise-Grade Scalability:
    LoadRunner can simulate hundreds of thousands of concurrent users, making it ideal for stress and endurance testing at massive scale.
  • Mature Ecosystem and Protocol Support:
    With decades of development, LoadRunner offers a rich set of features, protocols, and third-party integrations for virtually any type of system.
  • Tailored for Legacy and SAP Testing:
    LoadRunner excels in testing legacy systems, SAP environments, Citrix applications, and proprietary enterprise software, areas where many modern tools fall short.
  • Realistic Load Simulation:
    Thanks to advanced correlation, parameterization, and server-side monitoring capabilities, LoadRunner creates highly realistic test scenarios that mimic real-world user interactions and network behavior.

Disadvantages

  • Steep Learning Curve:
    While VuGen offers GUI elements, mastering advanced scripting, correlation, and parameterization often requires specialized knowledge, making onboarding slower for new teams.
  • Complex Licensing and Pricing:
    LoadRunner’s licensing model (based on virtual user counts, protocols, controllers) can become costly and confusing, particularly for scaling up large testing environments.
  • Heavy Resource Consumption:
    Load Generators are resource-intensive, demanding significant CPU, memory, and bandwidth during high-load tests, requiring robust infrastructure planning.
  • Less Flexibility in Cloud-Native CI/CD:
    Although integrations exist, LoadRunner’s architecture is still heavier compared to lightweight cloud-native tools, making it harder to fit into fast-moving DevOps pipelines without adjustments.
Discover more on SAP Load and Performance Testing Using LoadRunner

What Is NeoLoad?

NeoLoad - One of The Popular Load Testing Tools

NeoLoad (developed by Tricentis) is a modern performance testing platform designed to address the needs of agile and DevOps teams. Unlike traditional load testing tools built around legacy applications, NeoLoad focuses on speed, flexibility, and ease of use, enabling faster test creation and seamless integration into CI/CD pipelines.

It offers low-code and no-code options for test design, making it accessible to both technical and non-technical users, while also supporting complex performance testing for APIs, microservices, web, and mobile applications.

Key Features

  • Low-code/no-code test design:
    NeoLoad enables users to create complex load and performance tests through a visual interface without needing heavy scripting knowledge, significantly accelerating test preparation time.
  • Cloud-native deployment:
    NeoLoad supports cloud, hybrid, and on-premise deployments, allowing easy scalability using Docker, Kubernetes, and cloud platforms like AWS and Azure.
  • Built-in CI/CD integrations:
    Out-of-the-box integrations with Jenkins, Bamboo, Azure DevOps, and GitLab make NeoLoad a natural fit for modern continuous testing pipelines.
  • Advanced analytics and reporting:
    NeoLoad provides real-time dashboards, automated anomaly detection, SLA tracking, and easy-to-understand performance reports, helping teams catch issues faster.
  • Support for modern and packaged applications:
    In addition to REST APIs and web protocols, NeoLoad can also test SAP applications, Citrix environments, and packaged enterprise solutions.

Quick Summary Table of NeoLoad

AspectDetails
Protocol CoverageHTTP/S, WebSocket, SAP GUI, Citrix
Test DesignLow-code, no-code, visual scripting
ScalabilityCloud-native, Docker/Kubernetes integration
CI/CD IntegrationNative support for Jenkins, GitLab, Bamboo
Best ForWeb apps, APIs, microservices, agile teams
PricingSubscription-based; can increase with scale
Main ChallengesLimited legacy protocol support, higher costs at enterprise scale

Advantages

  • User-Friendly Interface:
    NeoLoad’s intuitive drag-and-drop interface and automatic correlation features reduce setup time and lower the barrier for non-developers.
  • Built for DevOps and Agile Workflows:
    NeoLoad was designed with automation in mind, making it easy to embed performance testing into CI/CD pipelines with minimal manual effort.
  • Fast Test Design and Execution:
    Compared to traditional tools, setting up and running tests in NeoLoad takes significantly less time, enabling more frequent performance validation during software delivery cycles.
  • Real-Time Collaboration:
    Teams can collaborate on test design, execution, and analysis using shared projects and version control, improving team efficiency.

Disadvantages

  • Limited Protocol Support Compared to LoadRunner:
    While NeoLoad covers the most common modern protocols (HTTP, WebSocket, SAP GUI), it doesn’t match LoadRunner’s extensive protocol library for legacy systems.
  • Cost at Scale:
    NeoLoad’s subscription model can become expensive for very large-scale tests, especially when compared to some open-source alternatives.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Scripting:
    Although initial test creation is easy, creating highly customized or technical scripts may still require developer involvement, particularly for complex enterprise scenarios.

NeoLoad vs LoadRunner: Main Differences

Now let’s break down the most relevant NeoLoad and LoadRunner differences to help you choose the right tool based on your project needs, environment, and business goals.

 NeoLoad and LoadRunner Comparison Table

CategoryLoadRunnerNeoLoad
Protocol Support50+ protocols including SAP, Citrix, OracleFocus on HTTP/S, WebSocket, SAP GUI, Citrix
DeploymentOn-premise (complex setup)SaaS, cloud, on-premise, hybrid
Supported PlatformsEnterprise apps, SAP, legacy systemsCloud-native apps, APIs, microservices
Ease of UseRequires scripting expertiseLow-code/no-code visual test design
Reporting & AnalyticsDetailed but technical; limited visualsReal-time dashboards and SLA tracking
Performance & ScalabilityEnterprise-grade but resource-heavyLightweight and cloud-native scalability
Pricing ModelLicense-based; complex tiersSubscription-based; flexible and predictable
Best ForLegacy and enterprise testingAgile teams, modern web and API testing

Protocols

  • LoadRunner: Offers extensive protocol support — over 50 protocols, including HTTP/S, Web, Citrix, SAP GUI, Oracle, and TCP/IP.
    Ideal for organizations working with legacy enterprise applications.
  • NeoLoad: Focuses mainly on modern protocols like HTTP/S, WebSocket, SAP GUI, and Citrix.
    Excellent for testing web apps, APIs, and packaged business applications but not as deep for legacy systems.

Deployment

  • LoadRunner: Primarily on-premise, requiring complex setup and dedicated infrastructure. Some cloud extensions exist but need extra configuration.
  • NeoLoad: Offers flexible deployment options — SaaS (cloud), hybrid, or on-premise — enabling faster scalability and easier integration into DevOps pipelines.

Supported Platforms

  • LoadRunner: Designed to handle enterprise-grade applications, including SAP, Oracle, Citrix, and legacy enterprise systems.
  • NeoLoad: Better suited for testing modern cloud-native applications, APIs, microservices, and web platforms.

Ease of Use

  • LoadRunner: Requires advanced scripting knowledge to create, customize, and maintain performance tests, especially for complex workflows.
  • NeoLoad: Provides a low-code/no-code approach with a visual test design interface, significantly reducing learning curves for new users.

Reporting & Analytics

  • LoadRunner: Generates detailed technical reports but has limited native visualization. Often needs third-party tools for enhanced dashboards.
  • NeoLoad: Offers real-time, interactive dashboards with built-in SLA tracking and automated anomaly detection — more user-friendly for business and technical audiences.

Performance & Scalability

  • LoadRunner: Highly scalable for massive enterprise testing but demands substantial computing resources and robust infrastructure.
  • NeoLoad: Built for cloud-native scalability; lightweight architecture makes it easier to run tests across distributed cloud environments.

Pricing & Licensing

  • LoadRunner: Traditional license model based on the number of virtual users (VUs) and protocol packs, which can be complex and expensive to scale.
  • NeoLoad: Subscription-based pricing, typically more flexible and predictable, especially for growing agile teams.

Use Cases

  • LoadRunner: Best choice for industries working with complex, legacy systems (like SAP) that require wide protocol coverage and high-volume simulations.
  • NeoLoad: Ideal for modern agile teams testing APIs, microservices, web apps, and ensuring continuous performance validation throughout the SDLC.

Looking to Simplify Your API Testing Workflow?

Explore our robust API Load Testing Tool designed for fast, scalable performance testing across modern platforms.

Why PFLB Is a Better Choice Than LoadRunner and NeoLoad

While LoadRunner and NeoLoad are respected tools in the performance testing space, they come with challenges, from steep learning curves to complex pricing and limited flexibility for modern DevOps workflows.

PFLB was built to address these gaps, offering a smarter, faster, and more accessible solution for businesses of all sizes.

mobile app performance testing pflb

Full Protocol Coverage

PFLB supports a wide range of protocols, including HTTP/S, Web, APIs, SAP GUI, Oracle, Citrix, and more. Whether you’re testing lightweight APIs or complex enterprise applications, PFLB provides full protocol support without the need for additional plugins or third-party tools.

Quick Onboarding and Intuitive UI

Getting started with PFLB is fast and hassle-free. Its intuitive user interface, built-in test templates, and guided test creation flows make it easy for new users to design and execute complex load tests, without weeks of training.

Real-Time Analytics and Customizable Dashboards

PFLB delivers real-time performance monitoring with highly visual dashboards. Teams can customize metrics, track SLA compliance, and spot anomalies instantly, improving decision-making and reducing time to resolution.

Seamless CI/CD Integration

Unlike traditional tools that require heavy scripting to integrate with pipelines, PFLB natively connects with Jenkins, GitLab, Azure DevOps, and other CI/CD tools, enabling continuous performance testing with minimal configuration.

Effortless Cloud and Hybrid Scalability

PFLB scales dynamically, whether you need a few hundred virtual users or hundreds of thousands. Deploy tests on cloud infrastructure, on-premises, or hybrid environments without complex setup or manual scaling efforts.

Affordable, Transparent Pricing

With flexible plans tailored to your usage and needs, PFLB offers more affordable and predictable pricing compared to traditional license-based models. Every plan includes full-service support, giving your team direct access to performance testing experts whenever needed.

PFLB offers a complete performance testing alternative to LoadRunner and NeoLoad, with more flexibility, faster setup, and dedicated support at every step.

Whether you’re testing APIs, modern SaaS platforms, or large-scale enterprise systems, PFLB helps you optimize performance testing without the traditional complexity.

Ready to Explore a Smarter Way to Test?

Contact our team today and see how PFLB can fit into your environment.

Contact Us

Final Thought

Both NeoLoad and LoadRunner are capable performance testing tools, but each comes with its limits, whether it’s around pricing structures, protocol coverage, or ease of use in modern environments.

If you’re looking for a modern, scalable, and expert-backed solution, PFLB combines the strengths of both while eliminating their complexity.

Try PFLB’s user-friendly platform today and simplify your load testing process!

Ready to Get Started with Load Testing?

Start Testing Now
Table of contents

    Related insights in blog articles

    Explore what we’ve learned from these experiences
    More Blog Articles
    14 min read

    Top 10 Online Load Testing Tools for 2025

    best online load testing tools preview
    May 19, 2025

    In this article, we will go through our favourite features of each of these cloud-based load testing tools, while in the end you will find a parameterized comparison of all of them in one table.

    7 min read

    What Is Chaos Engineering: Overview

    chaos engineering preview
    May 14, 2025

    Chaos engineering is a way to test how complex systems respond to unexpected problems. The idea is simple: introduce controlled failures and watch how the system behaves. This helps uncover weak points before they lead to costly outages. An approach that forces you to think about the unexpected, making it easier to build robust, fault-tolerant […]

    7 min read

    Continuous Performance Testing

    continuous performance testing preview
    May 12, 2025

    Continuous performance testing is a proactive approach to validating the speed, stability, and scalability of software throughout the development lifecycle. It ensures that applications remain responsive under different loads, providing a smoother user experience and reducing the risk of performance-related issues in production.In this guide, we’ll look at what continuous performance testing actually involves, why […]

    8 min read

    K6 vs JMeter: Which Is The Best Tool?

    k6 vs jmeter preview
    May 2, 2025

    When it comes to performance testing, two of the biggest names, K6 and JMeter, often dominate the discussion. But which one truly fits your testing needs? In this article, we’ll break down K6 vs. JMeter: their features, capabilities, strengths, weaknesses, and critical differences.  We’ll also introduce a more advanced alternative, PFLB’s load testing platform, for […]

  • Be the first one to know

    We’ll send you a monthly e-mail with all the useful insights that we will have found and analyzed

    • People love to read

    Explore the most popular articles we’ve written so far