When choosing load testing tools for your software, go for solutions that match your needs and budget. To help you with the decision, we collected top tools for load testing and compared them in this article.
1. PFLB
PFLB is an easy-to-use solution that doesn’t require you to be a load-testing engineer or hire one. This next-gen load testing tool imports load profile data from Google Analytics and other sources. All you need to do is log in, and PFLB will help you run load tests without coding or other engineering.
Meanwhile, PFLB is for more than just non-specialists. It offers performance-testing solutions fit for load testing web applications and APIs. It provides tps generator capabilities, making it suitable for network performance testing.
Developers and performance engineers also benefit from PFLB, as it lets them conduct performance tests in the cloud. They can make the most of the given load testing tools, such as HAR/Insomnia import, request definition, parameterization, and correlation, running in the cloud as a SaaS service. You are also free to manage and reuse tests, centralize assets, compare results, see trends across time, and share results and reports.
Pros
Cons
Pricing
Free to $400/month.
2. BlazeMeter
BlazeMeter is an open-source load testing tool that supports various protocols and integrations. It is a great alternative to JMeter for performance and load testing.
This service is highly user-friendly and has essential functionalities for effective load testing. The core feature is its support for various script formats that eliminates the need for file conversion and simplifies the test creation.
Additionally, BlazeMeter offers a Chrome extension for effortless script recording and direct uploading in formats like JMX, JSON, and YAML.
Pros
Cons
Pricing
Free to $649/month.
3. OctoPerf
OctoPerf offers a free tier of website load testing tools, supporting HTTP load testing, web app load testing, and server performance testing.
This platform is said to simplify the test creation process. Users can start by importing URLs, REST APIs, HAR/JMX scripts, or Postman collections.
Also, among its top features are the ability to establish Service Level Agreements (SLA), monitor application performance (APM), and produce comprehensive transaction reports. Additionally, OctoPerf supports integration with developer tools for seamless continuous integration (CI) processes.
Pros
Cons
Pricing
Free to $649/month.
4. Gatling Enterprise Cloud
Gatling Enterprise Cloud is known for its fancy load testing tools for web applications. It supports various protocols and performance testing automation tools.
The platform is fit for the well-versed in Scala ones. Upon testing, it generates an automated, dynamic, and visually appealing report for analysis.
The platform is embraced with comprehensive technical support. Thus, users can gain insights into its functionalities. Gatling supports Gradle, Maven, or SBT for projects with a longer timeline.
Pros
Cons
Pricing
Free to €1380/month.
5. K6 Cloud
K6 Cloud is a load test service that supports automated performance testing. It is famous for its application performance testing tools and network load testing.
The service enables users to generate scripts in JS or leverage a Chrome extension for HAR format uploads. The platform is fit for scheduling tests for automatic execution, configuring application performance monitoring (APM) integrations, and sharing test results through public links.
Pros
Cons
Pricing
Free to $1499/month.
6. Flood.io
Flood is a relevant cloud-based, browser-centric load-testing tool for website and web application stress testing. It lets users effortlessly generate scripts with Typescript and use tools like JMeter, Gatling, Element, or Selenium.
The interface is designed for optimal user experience. Flood allows configuring Service Level Objectives (SLOs) and integrates with AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud.
Pros
Cons
Pricing
Free to €3,745/month.
7. Loadview
Loadview is good for cloud-based stress testing and supports browser-based loads. It interfaces with REST, SOAP, and JSON APIs, offers AWS and Azure load generators, and allows custom JMX script imports. It enables SLA configuration, Jenkins integration, and manual monitoring setup.
Pros
Cons
Pricing
$199 to $499/month.
8. Loader.io
Loader.io is a load testing platform for web apps and APIs. Its core feature is manual script compilation. However, the service lacks the functionality to import existing tests.
Loader.io simplifies load testing via API, supports APM, and integrates with Jenkins and Circle. It offers a free plan with limited features and an advanced plan for more extensive testing.
Pros
Cons
Pricing
Free to $99.95/month
9. LoadFocus
LoadFocus is a cloud testing platform for load and functional testing of websites, web applications, and APIs. Tests can be created manually or with the help of JMX scripts.
The platform lets one choose whether web pages should load in a mobile or desktop context and supports scheduling tests for automated execution.
The service offers access to Amazon instances across multiple geolocations. Chrome extensions boost the testing process and result analysis. The Load Testing plugin makes integration with Jenkins straightforward. Users can also conduct visual regression tests and emulate mobile devices.
Pros
Cons
Pricing
Free to $399.
10. Neoload Web SAAS
NeoLoad Web SAAS by Neotys is a relevant platform for continuous testing. It simplifies test creation with YAML or ZIP scripts and offers diverse instances for varied testing needs. Its interface enables SLA configuration and dashboard management and provides detailed statistics for result analysis. It supports integration with Jenkins, Azure DevOps, and Gitlab.
One of its perks is daily performance regression testing with trend reports. Testing can be conducted via the NeoLoad Controller.
Pros
Cons
Pricing
Pay-as-you-grow.
11. LoadNinja
LoadNinja is a cloud-based solution for website and API load testing. Unlike traditional methods, users can record actions directly in the interface instead of importing scripts. It boosts detailed SLA configuration during script creation.
With various AWS instances available, setting up load parameters is pretty straightforward. LoadNinja employs real browsers to generate load, ensuring accurate user interaction representation. It offers real-time monitoring and enables post-test comparisons for better analysis. Integration with Jenkins is seamless, and robust support resources are available.
Pros
Cons
Pricing
From €249/month to €1,009/month.
12. Loadium
Loadium simplifies performance testing with an intuitive platform suitable for all skill levels. Users can quickly start tests by uploading scripts or building them manually.
The platform offers script conversion features and precise load control settings. Key features include access to Amazon instances, dedicated IP addresses, APM tools, and Jenkins integration. The Loadium Record & Play extension enhances test recording and execution.
Pros
Cons
Pricing
Free to $349/month.
Load Testing Tools Comparison 2024
Our detailed comparison of these tools will empower you to find the best solution. If you need more details, don’t hesitate to get in touch. We’re here to assist you and bring your load testing to the next level.
| Parameter | PFLB Platform | BlazeMeter | OctoPerf | gatling.io | k6.io | flood.io | loadview | loader.io | loadfocus.com | neoload SAAS | Load Ninja | Loadium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Configurable own tests |
|
|
|
|
|
but very basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Cloud | AWS or private cloud | AWS, Azure, G.Cloud | AWS, Digital Ocean, Azure | AWS | AWS | AWS, Azure, G.Cloud | AWS, Azure | AWS | AWS | AWS, Azure, G.Cloud | AWS | AWS |
| Different locations | Coming soon |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Google Analytics Yandex.Metrica |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| HAR import |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Built-in converter from har to jmx |
| Rest API collections import (Insomnia, Postman) |
|
|
for Postman,
for Insomnia |
|
|
|
Postman |
|
|
|
| Built-in converter from har to jmx |
| Selenium WebDriver scripts support |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Run your existing tests |
based |
JMeter, Gatling, Selenium, Taurus |
JMeter- based |
Gatling-based |
HAR |
JMeter, Gatling |
JMeter |
|
JMeter-based |
yaml-based |
|
JMeter, Gatling |
| SLA |
|
, but it`s possible to set RPS limit |
|
|
, Thresholds, | ContentSLO, only transaction- based |
|
, Thresholds |
|
|
|
, but it`s possible to set TPS limit |
| Integration with CI |
|
|
|
using the plugin |
via outer CI tool |
via outer CI tool |
|
|
using the plugin |
|
|
|
| Tests comparison |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Trend reports |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Real Browser testing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| JMeter parameters override |
|
|
|
Simulation System Properties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Detailed traces with errors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Granularity | down to 1 sec | down to 1 sec | down to 5 sec | down to 1 sec |
| down to 1 sec< | down to 1 sec | down to 1 sec | down to 100 ms | down to 1 sec | down to 1 sec | down to 1 sec |
| Free version? no upfront commitment |
|
|
|
|
| Credit card needed to start |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| APM Integrations | Grafana/ Telegraf | DX APM, AppDynamics, AWS Cloudwatch, DynaTrace and New Relic | New Relic, Dynatrace, AppDynamics, Instana | using the plugin | Azure Monitor, DataDog, Grafana Cloud, New Relic | Dynatrace | using a plugin | New Relic |
|
|
| New Relic, AppDynamics |
| Automated breakdown by transactions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Autostop |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related insights in blog articles
Why Load Testing Is Essential for Ecommerce Businesses
The success of 26 million online retailers depends on the page load time. It significantly impacts the profitability of online services and sales, as customers don’t want to wait over three seconds to make a purchase. To ensure the desired speed, load testing is widely applied. Common Ecommerce Problems That Can Be Solved with Load […]
Everything You Should Know about Performance Testing of Microservices
About 85% of enterprise businesses use microservices. In this article, we will cover the primary specifics of microservices, explain why they need performance testing, and highlight how to make this process efficient. Microservices in a Few Words Microservices (or microservices architecture) refers to a methodology for developing and deploying applications. This approach separates an extensive […]
PFLB is Now SOC2 Compliant
The PFLB team is happy to share the good news. We have passed the SOC 2 compliance accreditation. It means we can assure our clients that our cooperation will be entirely secure. What Is SOC? Introduced by the American Institute of CPAs (AICPA), SOC, or Service Organization Control, is a cybersecurity series of reports made […]
How Do Businesses Benefit from Frontend Performance Testing?
Crucial bottlenecks are usually backend-related. That’s why backend performance testing is generally regarded as a must. However, only 1% of companies perform frontend performance testing. They don’t consider that to achieve the best business results, one should combine the two types. Let’s prove it. We will define their differences, emphasize the importance of conducting backend […]
Be the first one to know
We’ll send you a monthly e-mail with all the useful insights that we will have found and analyzed
People love to read
Explore the most popular articles we’ve written so far
- Android vs iOS App Performance Testing: What’s the Difference? Dec 9, 2022
- How to Save Money on Performance Testing? Dec 5, 2022
- Performance Testing: What It Is, and Why You Need It Oct 7, 2021
- Cloud-based Application Testing: Features & Types Apr 15, 2020