Every software functions thanks to communication processes between modules. While a project team is working on the build release, knowing that the basic app blocks function well when put together is essential. That’s why tech companies run integration testing.
As an alternative, there’s unit testing — it’s smaller in scale and cheaper, and allows to examine the product on the micro-level — unit by unit.
Although these two approaches are complementary, it’s important to understand the difference between unit testing vs integration testing. In this post, you’ll find out what the objectives of both testing types are, their respective advantages, as well as unit test vs integration test example.
What Is Integration Testing?
The integration testing definition refers to assessing the communication between separate software modules. Typically, the project team has to unit test the system before moving on to integration testing. In the software development life cycle, integration testing is the second step.
The main aim of integration testing is to make sure the differences in logic patterns developers use when creating a module don’t compromise the connectivity of the system. There are several approaches to integration testing:
Integration Testing Objectives
By conducting integration testing, teams aim to ensure that the system has no connectivity or communication issues on the level of software modules. If undetected, integration failures are difficult and expensive to fix after the product’s release as developers have to make in-depth system-level changes to remove these defects.
After the integration testing process is complete, the testing team can focus on validating end-user journeys and usability.
The main integration testing objectives are follows:
Advantages of Integration Testing in Software Development
Integration testing in software testing is a must-have. It helps teams pinpoint weak spots and system defects at the early stages of development and promotes more confidence in the product.
Here are some integration testing advantages:
If you use microservices, third-party APIs, or CI/CD pipelines, read also about Contract Testing vs Integration Testing.
Unit Testing Definition
If you compare unit vs integration testing, unit testing is the first testing activity in the software testing life cycle. It’s a common practice for project teams to not involve testers in these stages, asking developers to perform unit tests instead.
Unit testing does not require any specialized skills or well-trained workforce. Although there’s been much backlash regarding the high cost and inefficiency of unit tests, the approach has its own advantages.
Units are the objects of unit testing — these are the smallest components of a tested system. As a software project typically consists of multiple units, automating unit testing is a popular practice among QA teams.
The Objectives of Unit Test
In a nutshell, unit testing aims to separate system components and check their individual functionality. Other than the primary objective, the approach helps tech teams accomplish the following:
Find bugs early in the development cycle
Unit testing allows introducing bugs and system defects early on in the development process. This way, the development team can resolve issues before integrating the units together and impacting the whole system.
Use unit testing logs as documentation
The logs of unit testing will offer the project team a detailed description of the system on the micro-level. This testing method improves the interchangeability within the team since a newcomer developer can rely on logs provided by peers to be more familiar with the system. Unit testing provides a solid basic framework for understanding and handling APIs.
Improve the efficiency of code reuse
Unit tests improve code reusability since the reused units are well-tested. If the development team misses out on unit testing, the odds of reusing buggy code and spawning numerous system failures in the future increase dramatically.
By testing the units beforehand, developers can be confident that there are no bugs or compilation issues, and that the written code fulfills its function according to business specification requirements.
Validate the behavior of the system’s atomic behavioral unit
Missing out on unit testing will make other testing cycle stages considerably more challenging since the impact of system failures will have a higher magnitude and is likely to prevent the program from working altogether.
Testing every unit of a system individually is a way to ensure that code-level bugs will not complicate integration or system testing.
Advantages of Unit Tests in Software Development
Unit testing is considered, by many teams, an unneeded addition to a tester’s busy working routine. Since it takes a while to unit-test the entire system, it’s common for tech project managers to skip the stage altogether.
The truth is, unit testing should be integrated into the development routine since it’s relatively cheap and easy to perform. The advantages of the approach are numerous — here are but a few:
Difference Between Unit Testing and Integration Testing
As we compared unit and integration testing, it’s evident that both approaches have significant differences. To clarify the distinction between the two, take a look at the unit test vs integration test comparative table.
| Unit testing | Integration testing | 
| Validates the system unit-by-unit | Assesses the system as a whole by integrating several modules simultaneously | 
| Fully autonomous — each unit is treated as a separate system | Connected since the testing team predominantly pays attention to the relationship between tested components | 
| First level of software testing | Follows unit testing in the SLDR | 
| No reliance on dependencies | Strongly relies on dependencies, involves the use of databases | 
| Tests are faster to perform | Tests are slower | 
| Usually performed by developers | Requires an experienced testing team | 
| Is performed at the coding level | Is performed at the communication level | 
Summary
Unit testing and integration testing are both a part of the software testing life cycle. The two share a common objective — detecting software defects as early on as possible.
There’s a big difference between unit testing and integration testing. While the former approaches the system as a series of modules and examines the interactions and proper connectivity between them, the latter tests the product unit-by-unit. 
If you want to conduct both of these software testing types, reach out to PFLB. Our certified testers will bring forth the best testing practices to ensure your software is fully tested and the results are well-documented to avoid post-release bugs and defects. Take a look at the group of testing services our team offers. Leave us a message to discuss your idea and testing needs in detail — our account manager will reach out to you shortly.
Related insights in blog articles
Swagger API Testing: What It Is, How It Works, and Best Practices for QA Teams

Testing APIs without proper documentation can feel like walking through fog — every endpoint is a guess, every parameter a risk. But not with Swagger UI API testing. Swagger turns static API definitions into a live, interactive interface where developers and QA teams can validate endpoints, check request/response schemas, and explore the system in real […]
BlazeMeter vs. JMeter: Full Comparison

Ever wondered whether you should stick with Apache JMeter or move your tests to BlazeMeter? Both tools are powerhouses in performance and load testing, but they serve different needs. JMeter is an open-source desktop tool under the Apache 2.0 license; ideal for local or distributed testing across HTTP, APIs, JDBC, and more. BlazeMeter, on the […]
Endurance Testing: What It Is, Types & Examples

When performance engineers talk about endurance testing, they usually mean soak testing — a long-duration performance test that keeps the system under a steady, realistic workload for hours or even days. It’s designed to uncover what short stress or load tests can’t: slow memory leaks, growing queues, or throughput that quietly drops overnight. By tracking […]
Top 5 AI Load Testing Tools in 2025: Smarter Ways to Test Performance

AI is quickly becoming the most overused promise in software testing — every platform now claims it, but few can prove it.Some “AI load testing tools” genuinely analyze data, learn from patterns, and generate meaningful insights. Others stop at fancy dashboards and static scripts dressed in new terminology. In this comparison, we’ll separate real machine […]
Be the first one to know
We’ll send you a monthly e-mail with all the useful insights that we will have found and analyzed
People love to read
Explore the most popular articles we’ve written so far
- Top 10 Load Testing Tools for 2025: The Deep Dive Sep 9, 2025
- Cloud-based Testing: Key Benefits, Features & Types Dec 5, 2024
- Benefits of Performance Testing for Businesses Sep 4, 2024
- Android vs iOS App Performance Testing: What’s the Difference? Dec 9, 2022
- How to Save Money on Performance Testing? Dec 5, 2022