During website or application maintenance, developers are often forced to change their code or add new features. Unfortunately, after code modifications, software does not always work as it did before – system collapses and crashes are a challenge to watch out for.
Moreover, one code change can slow down the performance of the entire project considerably, reducing page load time and increasing the usage of system resources. In order to prevent negative effects after a change in software, development teams run regression testing.
In this blog post, you’ll find out the definition of regression testing, why regression testing is important, what it consists of, and tips and tools for its successful execution.
Table of Contents:
- What is Regression Testing?
- Regression Testing in Software
- Who Needs Regression Testing?
- Types of Regression Testing
- How to do Regression Testing
- Examples of Regression Tests
- Regression Testing at PFLB
What is Regression Testing?
IT professionals define regression testing as a part of software testing designed to determine if a system is crash-resistant and functional after a code change. At this stage, a tester re-executes a set of cases they ran during the initial development stage to ensure there is no negative impact. It’s important to test not just the part of the code that has been modified or a newly added feature but the entire system.
In order to cut the cost and the number of hours needed for full regression testing, most companies run automated sessions. This way, they are capable of maintaining higher precision and reducing human error as well as run uninterrupted testing 24/7.
Regression Testing in Software
Regression testing is a crucial part of software maintenance. Its main purpose is to find bugs in the overall system that have been overlooked after the introduction of a new feature. Here’s an example of regression testing in software:
Example: App A is a database management tool. There are three basic functions – Add, Save, Delete – that allow users to enter data or delete a row. In a new build, an ‘Update’ feature has been introduced as well to allow users to edit the changes and save the input. During regression testing, a QA specialist will have to determine if the introduction of a new feature didn’t impact the way ‘Add’, ‘Save’, and ‘Delete’ buttons work.
There are several approaches to regression testing. Here’s a brief rundown of the most widely used techniques.
- Retest everything. This approach implies that all the tests of the system should be re-executed. While it’s the safest way to ensure the project is bug-free, it takes a lot of time and commitment to run a full suite of tests. That’s why the ‘retest everything’ practice is rarely used among testers and, in the case where a team decides to go with it, the sessions will most likely be automated.
- Regression test selection. By selecting a subset of existing test cases, a QA specialist can cut the operating costs tremendously compared to retesting the entire system. There are several practices testers use to select a case of regression test sessions. To start with, you can only test a suite that yields coverage to the modified section of the original program. Another popular approach is a Safe Technique where a tester works with the number of cases that expose one or multiple faults in the modified program. Other approaches to test selection include Data Flow Coverage Techniques and Random Techniques.
- Prioritization of test cases. This approach allows a QA specialist to focus on testing the most frequently used functionalities and cases that have a crucial business impact while temporarily putting all the secondary features aside. By prioritizing test cases, you will cut the size of the testing suite tremendously and have more time to thoroughly assess the performance of the crucial parts of the system.
Who Needs Regression Testing?
Unfortunately, it’s hard to imagine a product that would never need to undergo changes. In order to stay relevant and attract more users, developers have to upgrade their projects with new features, change the back-end to make the tool’s performance more effective, and adapt to managing a bigger amount of incoming traffic.
Maintaining a software product without regression testing will result in massive tech debt and the fall of user satisfaction.
The regression testing meaning for developers consists of the following:
- Ensure a bug-free performance after changing the back-end code. Introducing a new feature can impact the entire system – and not necessarily in a good way. Testers run regression testing sessions in order to ensure the performance of the system didn’t take a hit after as much as a small code modification.
- Test the performance of the application after adding a new feature. Regression testing allows developers to know that new functionalities align well with the old ones, that the infrastructure of the product is capable of executing more complex actions without losing in load time speed or crashing, and so on.
- Detect and fix performance issues. Even if you did no major code changes, it’s still wise to run a regression testing session in case a performance defect has been recorded. Coming back to retest the original test suite allows developers to save time as they don’t have to write new cases.
- Define the parts of an application that are at the highest risk of failure. Regression testing will help the development team understand which parts of the system are the most vulnerable to changes and have the highest odds of crashing. Testers will know to pay more attention to the maintenance of these features in the future.
Types of Regression Testing
There isn’t a single defined approach to regression testing. Apart from the techniques discussed above (those that have to do with the size of the test suite), there are a few types of regression testing. Let’s take a look at go-to approaches testers normally use:
- Corrective regression testing. This approach is used when the program hasn’t been changed significantly. For such sessions, developers rarely write new test cases – instead, they prefer reusing the old ones.
- Progressive regression testing. This approach is used to test the impact of a new component on the system. In order to use progressive regression testing, team members should be well aware of the exact number and the nature of code changes. For this type of testing, new cases are written.
- Selective regression testing. In this case, a tester chooses a range of test cases in order to speed up the progress. While this approach is a good way to put less money and effort into retesting, it’s quite challenging for developers to set the conditions between the experiment and the range of covered program elements.
- Complete regression testing. This approach is normally used when the development team struggles to define the number of changes made or the impact of these modifications. Complete regression testing gives a QA professional a complete snapshot of a system as a whole. Normally, this is deployed in the final stages of development before the release of a build.
How to do Regression Testing
Creating a strategy during the early stages of development and aligning with it until the product release is a good way to do regression testing. The good news is, building a testing framework is relatively straightforward. Here are the steps QA specialists normally take in order to get started.
Step 1. Gather tests for execution
The first step in designing a regression test strategy is collecting all cases a QA specialist intends to re-execute. Here are a few tips on smart test selection:
- Include cases in error-prone areas of the program as they are likely to be most vulnerable to system changes as well.
- Add cases that verify the main functions of the product. This includes the homepage, the login page, the checkout gateway, and so on.
- Include complex cases such as GUI event sequences.
Step 2. Estimate the time for test cases execution
Be sure to estimate the time needed to test every chosen feature. Keep in mind that, apart from a session, your testers might need to take some time in order to get to know the range of tools used to execute and report particular tests and add it to the schedule. Here are a few other factors that can influence the amount of estimated time for testing:
- Creation of test data;
- Regression test planning (especially for a beginning QA specialist);
- Reviewing test cases.
Step 3. Outline which tests can be automated
Automated tests are faster and more reliable than manual ones. In the long run, you’ll be able to reuse such scripts for your next project – this improves the efficiency of software maintenance and creates a set of standards within the team.
When it comes to regression testing, developers tend to automate most cases. However, if you’re looking at a complex sequence of events – it’s better to execute a manual check. The same stays true for all GUI-related cases – here, manual testing is often the only option.
Dividing manual and automated tests into two separate groups is the best way to avoid miscommunication within the team and keep reports in order.
Step 4. Prioritize test cases
It’s always helpful for a tester to determine which cases are the most relevant for the program and focus on executing them as a first priority. In order to manage sessions productively, it crucial to prioritize. Here’s a simple framework you can follow while grading the value of test cases.
- Priority 0. All the sanity test cases fall into the category. The tests of the basic functionality of the product and pre-system acceptance are the first a QA specialist should concentrate on as they provide the most value both for users and engineers.
- Priority 1. If your program has features that are crucial but not core (in other words, a tool would still work without them but the performance wouldn’t be satisfactory), the cases to test them fall under Priority 1 and are to be handled as soon as all the scenarios labeled as Priority 0 are checked.
- Priority 2. Includes test cases that are not providing high project value but are crucial to avoid tech debt and complications for developers. On a user’s side, the impact of these features is not noticeable.
Step 5. Use tools to speed up the testing process
There’s a wide range of tools for regression testing that help QA specialists handle planning, preparation, and reporting. Using these off-the-shelf solutions allows the team to speed up the process and use the best practices of regression testing.
Here are some tools developers can consider using to improve the efficiency of testing:
- Selenium – a portable framework for web application testing;
- QTP – provides regression testing for environments and software;
- Watir – a tool that enables the automated testing of Ruby-based apps;
- Rational Functional Tester – an automated testing tool that skillfully mimics the actions of a human tester.
Examples of Regression Tests
Regression tests have a broad range of applications. Let’s take a look at the most popular regression testing example list.
- Bug regression – a tester checks if a specific bug that has allegedly been fixed is in fact eliminated;
- General functional regression – a range of broad tests across all areas of the app to ensure if recent changes have resulted in code destabilization;
- Conversion and port testing – a suite of test cases is executed to ensure that the application has been successfully ported to a new platform;
- Localization testing – in case a program has been modified and rewritten in a new programming language, a tester assesses the performance of the interface and ensures that the application follows its new set of cultural rules. In order to execute such a test, you may have to modify old cases taking the change of a programming language into account or even write new ones.
- Build verification testing – a series of small tests aimed at verifying if a build is worth fixing or the damage is irreparable. A failed test would result in a build rejection.
Regression Testing at PFLB
In case you’re looking for a team of qualified regression testing specialists, consider contacting PFLB. We have a team of ISTQB-certified testers experienced in creating coverage for regression testing, prioritizing and executing test cases, and giving a comprehensive report regarding the ways to improve the build.
We use a large number of tools to run test cases – the list includes (but is not limited to) TestLink, JIRA, HP ALM, Microsoft TFS, and many more. In order to provide companies with agile maintenance, at PFLB we run continuous system monitoring of nightly and weekly builds.
Take a look at the full list of services offered by PFLB. If you want to work with a team of experienced testers, be sure to contact us.
Have a Project in Mind?
There is no better place for a QA solution than PFLB.
Drop us a line to find out what our team can do for you.