Go back to all articles

JMeter vs LoadRunner vs PFLB: Which Tool to Choose?

Nov 28, 2024
10 min read
man 110

Richard Epstein

Overview

Performance testing is essential for evaluating the response time, scalability, reliability, speed, and resource usage of applications and web services under their expected workloads. The software market currently offers a variety of performance testing tools, but two names that automatically come to mind are Apache JMeter and LoadRunner. The JMeter and LoadRunner difference is often a crucial factor for testers when choosing the right tool. Both of these tools excel at detecting performance issues and identifying limitations in software applications by applying increased load.

JMeter vs LoadRunner pros and cons—understanding these can help you make the right choice for your performance testing needs. However, in this article, we also aim to highlight our in-house tool, PFLB. We believe the smartest way to do this is to highlight the difference between LoadRunner and JMeter and PFLB; in order to reveal which tool may be best suited to your organization’s needs.  In comparing the key features we will discuss the possible differences that may affect how you do performance testing, thus impacting every aspect of your business.  So without further ado, let’s take a look at all three performance testing tools and talk about their advantages and disadvantages.

Comparison Table: JMeter vs. LoadRunner vs. PFLB

An in-depth look at leading performance testing tools, tailored to help you choose the right solution for your needs

What is JMeter?

Jmeter-logo

Apache JMeter is widely recognized as one of the best load testing tools available for developers, designed to facilitate web service testing. It is an open-source application, making it highly accessible for businesses of all sizes. JMeter supports a 100% Java-scripted desktop application and effectively tests web applications, ensuring optimal performance.

What makes JMeter unique is its versatility. It is compatible with a multitude of web and networking protocols, including HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, LDAP, SOAP, and TCP. Additionally, it offers compliance with JDBC and message-oriented middleware (MOM) through JMS. JMeter also supports email protocols such as IMAP, POP3, and SMTP, making it a comprehensive tool for various testing scenarios.

This tool enables software testers to evaluate both dynamic and static resources, such as queries, servers, logs, scripts, and files. By simulating real-world scenarios, it allows for comprehensive testing of applications under heavy load conditions, analyzing system behavior and performance under varying traffic levels. This helps identify bottlenecks, optimize resource usage, and ensure the application remains stable, robust, and efficient, making it a key asset in performance testing.

Key Features of JMeter

JMeter is a versatile protocol-level testing tool, ideal for evaluating the performance of server-side systems and applications. Here are the most relevant features for understanding its capabilities and practical applications:

  • 01
    Protocol Support: What Can Be Tested
    JMeter supports a wide range of protocols, enabling it to test various types of systems, including:
  • Web protocols: HTTP, HTTPS
  • Web services: SOAP and REST APIs
  • File transfers: FTP
  • Email systems: POP3, IMAP, SMTP
  • Database interactions: JDBC
  • Directory services: LDAP
  • This range of supported protocols ensures JMeter is highly versatile for performance testing, although it’s important to note that JMeter operates at the protocol level, not the browser level. It simulates network requests but does not render or test visual browser behavior like tools such as Selenium.
  • 02
    Extensibility and Customization
    JMeter can be extended and customized using a wide variety of plugins developed by the community or by individual users. This extensibility allows testers to adapt the tool to specific testing requirements, enabling unique test scenarios and enhanced functionality. You can find out more about JMeter’s extendability in the following JMeter Plugins Statistics article.
  • 03
    Distributed Load Testing
    JMeter supports distributed load testing by leveraging multiple load generators, either across different machines or through Kubernetes clusters. This enables simulation of large-scale scenarios, which is critical for applications that need to handle significant traffic. However, setting up distributed testing can be complex and may require additional expertise.
  • 04
    Performance Metrics Collection
    JMeter collects performance metrics in a traditional, file-based manner, storing results locally by default. For more modern workflows, it can integrate with tools like InfluxDB and Prometheus via the Backend Listener, enabling real-time metrics visualization through platforms like Grafana. This flexibility allows testers to choose the approach that best suits their needs.
  • 05
    Reporting Capabilities
    JMeter includes basic reporting tools to analyze key performance indicators such as response times, error rates, throughput, and transaction counts. While sufficient for many standard use cases, users seeking deeper insights often integrate JMeter with external reporting and visualization tools.
  • 06
    GUI: Legacy but Functional
    JMeter’s graphical user interface (GUI) has a legacy design that feels dated compared to modern tools. However, its familiarity and straightforward structure make it accessible for users accustomed to its workflow, even if it lacks the intuitive features of newer solutions.
  • 07
    Strong Community Support
    JMeter has one of the largest and most active communities in the performance testing space. This means users have access to extensive documentation, tutorials, and community-contributed plugins, simplifying the process of learning, troubleshooting, and extending the tool.

JMeter Pros and Cons

Advantages

  • Free of Charge: Being an open-source tool, it requires no purchase.
  • Data Extraction: Capable of extracting data in popular formats like JSON, XML, and HTML.
  • Command-Line Interface: Facilitates easier configuration for advanced users.
  • Compatibility: Works with various applications and protocols, providing extensive testing capabilities.

Disadvantages

  • Limited JavaScript Support: Does not natively support AJAX requests.
  • Backend listener: Its standard mechanism relies on metrics data aggregation, which can compromise results accuracy in favor of resource efficiency; customization may be required for certain scenarios.
  • Complexity in Advanced Applications: Testing complex applications with dynamic content may pose challenges.
  • Testing challenges: Can be difficult to test complex applications using JavaScript or dynamic content, such as CSRF tokens.
  • Infrastructure Requirements: Since JMeter operates as a traditional desktop application rather than a cloud-based solution, it requires users to set up and maintain load testing infrastructure, which can complicate operations and require additional resources.
  • Legacy GUI: While JMeter’s GUI is familiar for long-time users, it can feel a bit dated compared to modern tools, making it less intuitive and harder to adapt for users accustomed to contemporary interfaces.

When to Use JMeter?

JMeter is particularly suitable for large-scale web and banking applications where performance optimization is crucial. Its extensive capabilities allow for various types of testing, from load testing to functional testing, providing testers with the necessary tools to ensure high performance and reliability. JMeter is ideal for evaluating the functional capabilities of web services and applications while measuring load strength and compatibility across different platforms.

The tool’s open-source nature enables users to customize and develop features within the existing framework, encouraging an inclusive community of developers.

Integrations

JMeter integrates seamlessly with a variety of software tools, enhancing its capabilities and functionality:

  • 01
    Jenkins
  • 02
    GitLab CI/CD
  • 03
    Azure DevOps
  • 04
    Grafana
  • 05
    Dynatrace
  • 06
    AppDynamics
  • 07
    Selenium
  • 08
    InfluxDB

These categories demonstrate how JMeter can be adapted to integrate with a broad range of software tools, covering everything from monitoring and CI/CD to cloud services and custom APIs.  In summary, Apache JMeter is a robust and flexible performance testing tool that stands out for its ease of use, extensive protocol support, and the ability to adapt to various testing environments and needs.

What is LoadRunner?

LoadRunner-logo

LoadRunner is a sophisticated software performance testing tool developed by Mercury Interactive, a company specializing in software testing tools and is currently owned by OpenText.  Specifically designed to identify performance issues in web applications during the deployment phase. It is optimal for testing ERP software, legacy systems, and various web technologies.

LoadRunner testing tool provides users with an accurate and comprehensive view of an application’s end-to-end performance, allowing for the immediate detection and resolution of performance bottlenecks. It enables the emulation of thousands of users simultaneously, facilitating the simulation of real-life user loads on applications and ensuring they are prepared for live environments.

Key Features of LoadRunner

  • 01
    Extensive Protocol Support
    LoadRunner supports a wide range of application types, including mobile, .NET, Java, SOAP, Flex, HTML5, ERP systems, legacy applications, GWT, Silverlight, Ajax, TruClient, and Citrix. This versatility makes it an ideal tool for diverse performance testing scenarios.
  • 02
    Intuitive User Interface
    With a refined and intuitive user interface, LoadRunner streamlines the testing process, making it accessible even to less experienced testers. Its modernized design improves usability compared to earlier versions.
  • 03
    Advanced Scripting Options
  • Record & Play Feature: This functionality in LoadRunner simplifies the creation of test scripts by automatically recording user interactions with the application under test. It tracks HTTP/HTML requests, API calls, or other communication protocols as users navigate the application, generating a script that replicates these interactions. Here are the key features:
  • Reducing Manual Effort: Automatically generating scripts minimizes the time needed to create test scenarios manually.
  • Allows for Customization: Testers can enhance the recorded scripts by editing them to include parameterization, correlation, and logic for complex workflows.
  • Provides for Protocol Support: The Record & Play feature works across various protocols supported by LoadRunner, such as Web (HTTP/HTML), Web Services, and Citrix.
  • Advanced Debugging: LoadRunner’s advanced debugging tools empower testers to refine and troubleshoot scripts efficiently. Key debugging capabilities include:
  • Step-by-Step Execution: Allows testers to execute scripts one step at a time to identify issues in specific sections.
  • Breakpoints: Enable users to pause script execution at specific points, inspect variable values, and verify the correct flow of data.
  • Detailed Logs: Provides extensive logs that record the test execution process, helping testers pinpoint errors and identify unexpected behavior.
  • 04
    Performance Metrics Collection and Analysis
    During testing, LoadRunner collects data from key infrastructure components such as web servers and database servers. This data is then analyzed in detail, offering actionable insights into application performance and identifying root causes of any performance issues.
  • 05
    Robust Integrations
    LoadRunner integrates well with a suite tools, enhancing its performance testing capabilities and providing comprehensive solutions for QA testers, DevOps, and SREs:
  • Application Lifecycle Management (ALM): LoadRunner integrates with ALM to manage test assets efficiently. This integration allows users to store and retrieve VuGen scripts, Controller scenarios, and Analysis results within ALM projects. By connecting LoadRunner components to ALM, teams can centralize test management, ensuring consistency and traceability across the testing lifecycle.
  • Diagnostics: The integration between LoadRunner and Diagnostics provides in-depth analysis of application performance. During load testing, Diagnostics collects data from key infrastructure components, such as database and web servers. This data is then analyzed to identify performance bottlenecks and root causes of issues, enabling teams to optimize application performance effectively.
  • SiteScope: An integration with LoadRunner allows for real-time monitoring of system resources during performance tests. This integration enables testers to monitor the health and performance of servers, networks, and applications, providing valuable insights.
  • Real User Monitoring (RUM): A performance monitoring tool that captures and analyzes actual user interactions with an application in real-time. It tracks metrics such as page load times, user paths, error rates, and overall user experience. RUM provides insights into how real users experience an application, making it invaluable for identifying bottlenecks and improving application performance.

By combining these features, LoadRunner provides a comprehensive and powerful performance testing solution for applications across a variety of industries.

Pros and Cons of LoadRunner

Advantages of LoadRunner

LoadRunner presents various advantages:

  • Predictive Analytics: Enables advanced forecasting of resource requirements and performance bottlenecks.
  • Mobile Testing Features: Provides extensive options for testing mobile applications, allowing for evaluations in terms of device level, backend, and network performance.
  • Browser-Based Access: Facilitates easy access to global test resources.

Disadvantages of LoadRunner

Despite its advanced features, LoadRunner has several disadvantages:

  • High Cost: LoadRunner can be significantly more expensive than other tools.
  • Limited Flexibility: While LoadRunner does support open-source load testing technologies, it comes with licensing considerations. Testing with certain protocols may require verifying whether they are included in the Licensing Protocol Bundle, which can limit flexibility.

When to Use LoadRunner?

LoadRunner is ideal for organizations that need to test complex enterprise applications and require comprehensive analysis of performance bottlenecks. It is particularly useful for applications undergoing rapid development or changes, as it allows developers and testers to gain insights quickly and effectively.

Integrations

To enhance its capabilities, LoadRunner integrates with various tools, including:

  • Microsoft Visual Studio
  • SiteScope
  • Selenium
  • OpenText APM
  • DynaTrace
  • AppDynamics
  • Jenkins
  • UFT

Overall, LoadRunner’s versatility and robust feature set make it a powerful choice for comprehensive performance testing across diverse application environments.

What is PFLB?

PFLB - the Best Performance Testing Tool to Identify Performance Bottlenecks

PFLB is a next-generation AI-powered performance testing tool designed to streamline the testing process for a variety of users, including marketers, product and project managers, developers, and performance engineers. One of the main advantages of PFLB is its cloud-based architecture, which allows for unparalleled flexibility and scalability in load testing.

Benefits of Cloud-Based Load Testing

  • Accessibility: Users can run performance tests from anywhere, eliminating the need for local infrastructure setup. This is particularly beneficial for distributed teams and remote work environments.
  • Scalability: Cloud-based solutions can easily scale up or down based on testing needs, allowing users to simulate high loads without the constraints of on-premises hardware.
  • Cost Efficiency: By using a cloud-based tool like PFLB, organizations can reduce the costs associated with maintaining and upgrading physical servers and infrastructure.
  • Quick Deployment: Users can set up tests quickly without the need for extensive configurations, enabling faster testing cycles and quicker feedback on application performance.

Developers and performance engineers benefit from PFLB’s robust capabilities, allowing them to utilize a full suite of testing tools, such as API load testing with Postman collections, and access AI-powered performance insights and JMeter load testing tool as a service.

Additionally, PFLB supports the easy migration of existing open-source tests created in JMeter, allowing users to leverage their prior investments in test scripts. This feature ensures a smooth transition to PFLB without the need to recreate tests from scratch, maximizing efficiency and preserving valuable testing resources.

It is possible to leverage the powerful tool of Grafana dashboards to analyze the results of recurring tests, providing clear visibility into performance metrics. Overall, PFLB represents a new generation of performance testing products, empowering users to easily create, plan, run, and execute tests in the cloud through a simple and straightforward web interface. This cloud-based advantage is especially important for modern engineers, enabling distributed testing from various locations—a necessity for e-commerce businesses, particularly during peak shopping events like Black Friday.

Key Features of PFLB

PFLB is equipped with several advanced features that enhance its functionality and streamline the performance testing process:

  • 01
    Cloud Capabilities
    PFLB’s cloud capabilities provide scalable, geo-distributed load generation with support for 3,000,000 requests per second and more, enabling realistic performance testing for global applications.
  • 02
    AI-Powered Performance Insights
    PFLB’s AI-powered performance insights enhance load testing by automating the detection of performance bottlenecks and providing real-time analytics. This feature leverages artificial intelligence to analyze system behavior during tests, identifying significant deviations in core performance metrics and offering actionable recommendations for optimization.
  • 03
    Cloning Traffic Patterns
    Creating realistic load profiles is one of the most complex aspects of performance testing. PFLB simplifies this process by importing statistical data directly from Google Analytics, enabling users to generate highly realistic traffic patterns that mirror actual user behavior. This approach significantly reduces the time and effort typically spent building profiles manually.
  • 04
    No-Code Script Builder
    PFLB features an intuitive no-code script builder, allowing users to easily create and customize HTTP(S) requests through a drag-and-drop interface. This tool enables users to include elements such as bodies, headers, and parameters without requiring extensive coding expertise, making it accessible to a wide range of testers.

Pros and Cons

PFLB represents the next generation of performance testing tools, offering distinct advantages that set it apart from traditional solutions like JMeter and LoadRunner:

Advantages of PFLB

  • Cloud Deployment:

    Being a cloud-based solution, PFLB facilitates easy access and scalability, allowing users to run tests without the complexities of local infrastructure. This is particularly advantageous for teams looking to avoid the costs and hassle of setting up and maintaining load testing infrastructure.
  • User-Friendly Interface:

    PFLB is designed for simplicity, making it accessible even to non-technical users who can easily create and manage tests without extensive training.
  • Integration with Analytics Tools:

    It seamlessly connects with Google Analytics, providing comprehensive insights into application performance and user behavior.
  • Flexible Testing Options:

    PFLB supports a variety of application types, including websites, APIs, APMQ, Kafka, and mobile applications, making it versatile for different testing needs.
  • AI Capabilities:

    PFLB incorporates AI-powered features that simplify the work of performance engineers by helping to pinpoint bottlenecks and generate detailed reports. This functionality enables quicker diagnosis of performance issues and enhances the overall efficiency of the testing process.
  • Import Capabilities:

    Users can import HAR files, Postman and Insomnia collections, streamlining the test creation process.

Disadvantages of PFLB

Despite its advantages, PFLB does have some limitations:

  • Limited Support for Non-HTTP Protocols:

    Currently, PFLB focuses primarily on HTTP(S) applications, which may restrict its applicability for certain use cases requiring non-HTTP protocols.
  • Lack of Integration with certain tools:

    The absence of integrations with APM tools like Dynatrace and New Relic can hinder monitoring and troubleshooting, impacting performance management and user experience.

Overall, while PFLB excels in many areas and offers innovative features for performance testing, potential users should consider its limitations to determine if it aligns with their specific testing requirements.

When to Use PFLB

Want to See PFLB in Action?

Book a Demo

PFLB is an ideal choice for teams aiming to accelerate their performance testing cycles without the need for extensive testing expertise. It is particularly beneficial for marketing teams and project managers who require rapid feedback on application performance. Whether you’re testing web applications, APIs, gRPC, or Kafka, PFLB enables you to streamline your testing process and achieve significant efficiency gains. Notably, even users without prior experience in performance testing can effectively utilize PFLB’s intuitive interface to conduct comprehensive tests.

However, if you are testing proprietary, non-web-based systems, it may be more advantageous to stick with established tools like LoadRunner or JMeter, which offer broader support for diverse application types.

Integrations

To further enhance its testing capabilities, PFLB integrates seamlessly with various platforms, including:

  • Grafana: For real-time data visualization and monitoring.
  • Postman: To facilitate API testing and management.
  • Insomnia: For easy HTTP(S) request handling.
  • Google Analytics: To provide insights into user behavior and performance metrics.
  • CI/CD Tools via API: Allowing for streamlined integration into continuous integration and deployment workflows.
  • JMeter: Enabling users to export tests and leverage existing JMeter scripts within PFLB.

Overall, PFLB’s flexibility and integration capabilities make it a powerful tool for optimizing performance testing across a wide range of applications.

Comparing the Tools: Advantages, Disadvantages, and Best Use Cases

JMeter: Best for Open-Source Flexibility

Advantages:

  • Free and open-source, making it accessible for all.
  • Highly extensible and customizable for various needs.

Disadvantages:

  • Limited JavaScript Support: Does not natively support AJAX requests.
  • High Memory Consumption: Can consume significant memory when running in GUI mode.
  • Complexity in Advanced Applications: Testing complex applications with dynamic content may pose challenges.
  • Can be difficult to test complex applications using JavaScript or dynamic content, such as CSRF tokens.
  • Load Generation: The load generation is limited by existing hardware resources. Additionally, there are some important Java limitations, including:
  • Memory Management: Java applications can consume large amounts of memory, which can lead to performance degradation during extensive load tests.
  • Garbage Collection: Java’s garbage collection can introduce latency and unpredictable delays during testing, affecting the accuracy of load test results.
  • Thread Management: While JMeter supports multithreading, the underlying Java Virtual Machine (JVM) has limits on the number of threads that can be effectively managed, which may affect the scalability of tests.
  • Infrastructure Requirements: Since JMeter operates as a traditional desktop application rather than a cloud-based solution, it requires users to set up and maintain load testing infrastructure, which can complicate operations and require additional resources.

Best Use Cases:

  • Ideal for web applications and banking applications needing extensive customization and flexibility in testing scenarios.
  • Suitable for teams with strong technical expertise who can leverage its extensive scripting capabilities.

LoadRunner: Best for Comprehensive Analysis

Advantages:

  • Advanced predictive analytics for resource management.
  • Supports a wide range of applications and detailed performance insights.

Disadvantages:

  • High licensing costs, making it less accessible for smaller organizations.
  • Resource-intensive, requiring significant computing power.
  • Complex Debugging: The debugging process can be cumbersome and inefficient.
  • Limited Flexibility: LoadRunner does not support open-source load testing technologies, which may restrict users to its proprietary ecosystem and limit the ability to integrate with other tools or technologies that are more cost-effective or tailored to specific needs.

Best Use Cases:

  • Best suited for large enterprises and organizations that need detailed bottleneck analysis and performance forecasting.
  • Ideal for legacy systems and complex applications where thorough testing and analysis are critical.

PFLB: Best for Rapid Testing with Ease of Use

Advantages:

  • Cloud based architecture means no infrastructure costs.
  • Full support of JMeter tests.
  • AI-powered performance insights and reporting.
  • User-friendly with no-code capabilities, enabling non-technical users to perform tests.
  • Quick setup and deployment
  • On site version available when deemed appropriate by client.

Disadvantages:

  • Limited to HTTP-based applications, which may restrict use in some scenarios.
  • No integrations with APM tools.

Best Use Cases:

  • Best for performance engineers needing quick performance testing feedback without deep technical knowledge.
  • Suitable for web applications where rapid testing and integration with analytics tools are required.

Key Conclusions

In summary, each of the performance testing tools discussed—PFLB, LoadRunner and JMeter—has unique strengths and weaknesses. Your choice will depend on specific requirements such as budget, the complexity of applications, and testing needs.

  • PFLB
    PFLB is a modern cloud-based solution with full open-source support, making it a great option for performance engineers focused on quick testing cycles. Its ease of use and integration capabilities streamline performance testing while enabling users to efficiently migrate existing JMeter tests.
  • JMeter
    JMeter is an excellent choice for teams looking for a free, open-source tool with extensive customization options. It is particularly useful for users with programming knowledge who can leverage its scripting capabilities.
  • JLoadRunner
    LoadRunner is ideal for organizations that require detailed analysis and are willing to invest in a robust solution with extensive support for various applications and advanced features.

Discover the Right Performance Testing Tool for Your Needs

Ultimately, the choice between LoadRunner vs JMeter and PFLB depends on your unique testing needs, team expertise, and desired outcomes. Whether you’re seeking a cost-effective open-source solution, a comprehensive enterprise-grade tool, or a modern cloud-based platform, the right tool can make all the difference in achieving your performance goals.  For further insights into performance testing tools and methodologies, consider exploring the additional resources we’ve made available for you with this other great resource- best online load testing tools.

Need Help with Performance Testing?

Request a Quote

PFLB: Redefining Efficiency and Power in Performance Testing

For teams ready to streamline their testing cycles and performance testing process PFLB offers the perfect balance of modern, cloud-based efficiency and robust, open-source support. With its intuitive no-code capabilities, quick setup, and seamless integration options, PFLB empowers performance engineers to accelerate testing cycles and deliver actionable insights faster.

Whether you’re migrating existing JMeter tests or optimizing web applications with real-time analytics, PFLB simplifies the complexities of performance testing—so you can focus on achieving your goals.

Don’t let performance bottlenecks slow you down. Try PFLB today and experience the future of efficient, scalable testing.

Table of contents

Related insights in blog articles

Explore what we’ve learned from these experiences
More Blog Articles
6 min read

Top 5 JMeter Alternatives

top jmeter alternatives preview
Dec 20, 2024

It’s hard to find someone in the performance testing community who hasn’t heard of Apache JMeter. We love it for being open-source, free, feature-rich, protocol-friendly, and easily extendable. While JMeter remains a favorite, there are other tools that offer unique strengths and advantages. This article presents a comprehensive list of the top 5 JMeter alternatives, […]

5 min read

How to Load Test API: A Full Guide

how to load test API- a full guide preview
Dec 18, 2024

In today’s digital ecosystem, APIs form the backbone of diverse software applications, facilitating communication and data exchange for an interconnected digital world. However, as demand for these services grows, ensuring their robustness and ability to handle varying levels of traffic becomes crucial. This is where PFLB, a next-generation, cloud-based load testing tool, comes in. In […]

7 min read

Top 8 Gatling Alternatives Overview

Top Gatling alternatives preview
Dec 16, 2024

Gatling Cloud, a cloud-based extension of the open-source performance testing tool, is a powerful load testing solution with its benefits. Those include excellent scalability, no-code test builder, moderate price for virtual user hours (VUh), and numerous useful integrations. However, with its steep learning curve due to reliance on Scala/Java and setup (and overall) complexity, it […]

13 min read

Top 10 BlazeMeter Alternatives

top blazemeter alternatives preview
Dec 13, 2024

Over a decade ago, BlazeMeter reshaped the landscape of load testing by moving it to the cloud. Serving as a cloud-based execution platform for the well-known JMeter, it freed engineers from the burden of managing infrastructure and allowed them to focus solely on testing. The result was a significant reduction in operational complexity and a […]

  • Be the first one to know

    We’ll send you a monthly e-mail with all the useful insights that we will have found and analyzed

    • People love to read

    Explore the most popular articles we’ve written so far